This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] routing-wg Digest, Vol 102, Issue 3
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] routing-wg Digest, Vol 102, Issue 3
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] routing-wg Digest, Vol 102, Issue 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Feb 10 19:26:12 CET 2020
> Why do we suspect there are many of them? being among the guilty, i take tassos's point. > And whether they are beacons or not, why treat them any different? > Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose? :-) no, the opposite, assuming the purpose is rov deloyment. tassos's point was that prudent providers considering dropping invalids will measure first. and noise from researchers et alia may cause the op to think they will drop useful prefixes. trying to think of how to ameliorate this, it may be a case for your beloved communities. but nothing fancy or complex, please. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] routing-wg Digest, Vol 102, Issue 3
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] routing-wg Digest, Vol 102, Issue 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]