This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] RIS dumps, 0.0.0.0/0 routes and RPKI validator 3
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI Validator 3: RIS dump downloads - still plain HTTP
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RIS dumps, 0.0.0.0/0 routes and RPKI validator 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
nusenu
nusenu-lists at riseup.net
Sat Mar 16 23:57:00 CET 2019
Hello, I've got some really strange results when talking to rpki-validator 3's API and after some up and downgrading I concluded that it has to be in the RIS dumps (that was the only static data regardless of the validator version) and then I found the likely cause: AS15576 announcing 0.0.0.0/0 As of writing this email the first entry on this page: https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/bgp-preview but when we look at: https://stat.ripe.net/widget/as-routing-consistency#w.resource=AS15576 it is not there. I assumed RIPEstat uses the same data source (RIS) just with some less delay. Are 0.0.0.0/0 routes filtered by RIPEstat but included in RIS dumps? Should rpki-validator filter them out? thanks, nusenu -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20190316/e67a24e3/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI Validator 3: RIS dump downloads - still plain HTTP
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RIS dumps, 0.0.0.0/0 routes and RPKI validator 3
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]