[routing-wg] adding a RPKI indicator to RIPEstat's prefix consistency widget?

Hi Nusenu,

Thanks for the kind words, hearing from users that RIPEstat is useful is
the best motivation for us :)

Yes, there will be an addition highlighting the RPKI status to the
Prefix Routing Consistency widget and probably to other widgets as well.
In which form this will be realized is tbd but I will definitely take
your suggestions into account.

A requirement for these extensions will be to move the RPKI validation
data call [0] from development to production-grade, which will happen as
soon as the backend is ready to support a wide adoption by users. I hope
this to be done before the next RIPE meeting.

All the best,
Christian

[0] https://stat.ripe.net/docs/data_api#RPKI
[3]
https://stat.ripe.net/data/rpki-validation/data.json?resource=3333&prefix=193.0.0.0/21


On 25/09/2018 23:46, nusenu wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> I really like the prefix-routing-consistency widget [1],
> thanks for creating it.
> 
> I find it very useful when sending around URLs to point out certain prefix properties
> (i.e. announcement not matching IRR entry) and would see an additional RPKI related 
> use-case for that widget (to have it in one place).
> 
> What do you think about adding indicators for:
> - prefix is covered by a ROA and valid (green) - (mouseover could show the root CA)
> - prefix is not covered by a ROA (grey)
> - prefix is covered by a ROA, but invalid (red) - (mousover could show the invalid reason and ROA info)
> - an indicator for "is this prefix reachable?" in a ROV environment (yes = green, no = red)
> 
> that would to some extend be possibly covered with the rpki-validation data call already available
> https://stat.ripe.net/docs/data_api#RPKI
> 
> I think this would be very helpful when contacting network operators about their broken ROAs
> because most trust what they see on RIPEstat :)
> 
> Ideally that would also work on an AS level as has been suggested before [2] but either is fine.
> 
> 
> kind regards,
> nusenu
> 
> 
> [1] https://stat.ripe.net/widget/prefix-routing-consistency
> [2] https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/2018-May/003513.html
> 
> 

-- 
Christian Teuschel | Human behind RIPEstat
Follow me on Twitter: @NCC_RIPEstat

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180927/776c955a/attachment.sig>