This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Hijacking
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jacob Slater
jacob at rezero.org
Wed Jun 27 04:54:50 CEST 2018
> > I suspect that some entities would be marginally more reluctant to peer > with certain bad actors if a clear cut case could be made that those > specific bad actors have a habit and history of flaunting and/or ignoring > explicit contractual commitments, even if those commitments are never > enforced by the other party/parties to the relevant contract(s). > Most companies will not care about an alleged contract violation that was ultimately non detrimental to either party, especially when there were no consequences that were enacted by or befell upon either party. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180626/1642396f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Hijacking
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]