[routing-wg] Fwd: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?

If you receive packets sourced from 2002::/16 where do you plan to send
responses? They are valid IPv6 packets and addresses.

If you don't want to provide your customers with a route to 2002::/16 that
is your business, but recommending that 2002::/16 is a bogon mean no one
should accept or advertise the route which means no one can effectively use
6to4.  I'm happy to say that, but not without some data to back it up.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:

>
>
> > On Jun 18, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> >
> > Dear working group,
> >
> > Feedback welcome - should 2002::/16 still be accepted in the DFZ?
> >
>
> I think if providers still want to offer this as a service they can do
> this in their own networks, but it should not be generally in the DFZ.
>
> - Jared
>
>
>


-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180618/7d78e71f/attachment.html>