[routing-wg] Fwd: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?

Dear working group,

Feedback welcome - should 2002::/16 still be accepted in the DFZ?

Kind regards.

Job

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Job Snijders <job at ntt.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 23:08
Subject: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?
To: NANOG [nanog at nanog.org] <nanog at nanog.org>


Dear all,

TL;DR: Perhaps it is time to add 2002::/16 to our EBGP bogon filters?

It is kind of strange that in the default-free zone (where we don’t
announce defaults to each other) - we will propagate what is effectively an
IPv4 default-route, in the IPv6 DFZ.

IETF has politely abandoned the prefix:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7526

Wes George highlighted operational problems from accepting 2002::/16 on the
data-plane slide 6:
http://iepg.org/2018-03-18-ietf101/wes.pdf

Is there still really any legit reason left to accept, or propagate,
2002::/16 on EBGP sessions in the DFZ?

Kind regards,

Job
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180618/b0534185/attachment.html>