[routing-wg] A measurement of the RPKI adoption of the >3k Tor prefixes

Hi,

since I used your data, API (RIPEstat)
and tools (RPKI validator) I figured I send you also my
IRR and RPKI measurement results:

https://medium.com/@nusenu/how-vulnerable-is-the-tor-network-to-bgp-hijacking-attacks-56d3b2ebfd92

Thanks for making RIPEstat available for everyone.

If anyone can comment on how hard it is to get a ROA for a legacy IP block for a RIPE member 
without converting it to ALLOCATED PA block first, that would be interesting.
Also: is there any reason why a RIPE member would prefer to retain the LEGACY status? (instead
of converting it)

thanks,
nusenu

btw:
While collecting the IRR data
I stumbled on a problem with RIPEstat where it would say there is no IRR entry
but NTTCOM actually had it (Christian is looking into it).

https://stat.ripe.net/data/prefix-routing-consistency/data.json?resource=36.55.0.0/16
(if you change it to /17 the expected record will appear) 

       "routes": [
            {
                "origin": 10013, 
                "irr_sources": [], <<<<-------------------
                "in_whois": false, <<<<-------------------
                "asn_name": "FBDC - FreeBit Co.,Ltd.", 
                "prefix": "36.55.0.0/16", <<<<-------------------
                "in_bgp": true
            }

vs

whois -h rr.ntt.net 36.55.0.0/16
route:      36.55.0.0/16
descr:      FreeBit CIDR
origin:     AS10013
notify:     noc at FreeBit.NET
mnt-by:     MAINT-FBDC
changed:    y.ishizaki at FreeBit.NET 20120821
source:     NTTCOM

-- 
https://twitter.com/nusenu_
https://mastodon.social/@nusenu

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180820/2f38edf4/attachment.sig>