This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] Historical routing question
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Historical routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Apr 11 20:10:34 CEST 2018
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:47:16PM +0300, Jorma Mellin wrote:
> Hot-potato routing can definitely be the reason for such a low AD for eBGP.
Since hot-potato only chooses "eBGP vs iBGP", AD has no relevance here.
Unless you put your eBGP targets into your OSPF, and we all know that
this is not a very good idea :-)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20180411/28f23cc2/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Historical routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]