This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Historical routing question
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Historical routing question
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Historical routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maximilian Wilhelm
max at rfc2324.org
Wed Apr 11 11:36:27 CEST 2018
Anno domini 2018 Hank Nussbacher scripsit: Hi, > While giving a routing lecture today someone asked me > "Why was eBGP assigned an administrative distance of 20 which is better > than OSPF's administrative distance of 110. What was the logic behind > that decision?" > I was unable to think of an answer. > Ideas? As eBGP usually is a connection to some elses network, and OSPF only is internally to your network, the idea is to get packets away to someone else (-> the destination) as fast/early as possible and avoid transporting the traffic in your own network if there is an exit. Best Max -- Friends are relatives you make for yourself.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Historical routing question
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Historical routing question
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]