This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] [db-wg] Creation of out of region ROUTE(6) objects
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [db-wg] Creation of out of region ROUTE(6) objects
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Creation of out of region ROUTE(6) objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Thu Dec 14 12:19:54 CET 2017
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:01:33AM +0000, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote: > denis walker via db-wg wrote: > > The question we now need to answer is...Do we want to allow the > > creation of new ROUTE(6) objects in the RIPE Database for non RIPE > > address space? > > I would prefer not. I agree, ultimately doesn't belong in the RIPE database. However I'd like to ensure there is a comprehensive path towardst that goal. I can think of a number of steps to get there. - mark out-of-region objects as being out-of-region - present warnings to the user when out-of-region objects are created - block inserting new out-of-region objects - try to reach out to stakeholders of out-of-region route objects - delete objects which also exist in other databases - delete objects which are not visible in the DFZ - ... It'll be a lengthy road, but it can be done. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [db-wg] Creation of out of region ROUTE(6) objects
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Creation of out of region ROUTE(6) objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]