[routing-wg] AS47860 - 93.175.240.0/20

Yes, RIPE NCC should personally approve every person's router
configurations.  Please get started on that right away.

Leslie

Sent from the road while on tour

On Oct 8, 2016 14:04, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:

>
> Online records seem to suggest that the bogus unregistered AS47860
> is and always was just a property of the one and only entity that
> is providing it with route distribution, i.e. AS43659, D2 International
> Investment Ukraine, Ltd.
>
> http://1whois.ru/world/UA/%D0%9A%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2/LLC%20%22Albino%22
> (Note the abuse email address.)
>
> Note that AS43659, D2 International Investment Ukraine, Ltd. is itself
> an authorized RIPE NCC LIR:
>
> https://www.ripe.net/membership/indices/data/ua.d2investukraine.html
>
> I have already written to that organization via the following two
> email addresses and I have received no reply:
>
>     support at etthua.net, d2invest at meta.ua
>
> Could someone who actually speaks Ukranian please email these crooks and
> ask them nicely to stop passing routes for unregistered IPv4 space?
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg
>
>
> P.S.  Looking over this document:
>
>      https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-640
>
> It appears to me to be the case that it is possible to become a full
> fledged dues-paying RIPE NCC LIR member while having never made any
> sort of pledge whatsoever to refrain from announcing routes to IP space
> for which the member has no clear rights, either directly, from the
> relevant RIR, or indirectly from that actual registrant.  Is that
> correct?
>
> Forgive me.  Even after all this time, I'm still trying to wrap my
> head around this charade, this farce.  RIPE NCC makes, creates, and
> provides allocations, but then never formally asks any of its members
> to respect or obey any of those.  Is that about the size of it?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20161008/3f1f4cc7/attachment.html>