This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Who uses the RIPE IRR and for what?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Call for Input - RPKI Browser (by Matthias Waehlisch)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Thu Nov 27 14:06:50 CET 2014
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 06:20:51PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > At 14:42 11/06/2014 +0000, Job Snijders wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:15:54PM +0300, Sander Steffann wrote: > >> >> I think stripping/changing the notify-on-ref mail might hinder this. It > >> >> would be materially useful to preserve it, should exported IRR state be > >> >> used at another site aggregating data, to contact the prime information > >> >> manager. > >> > > >> > To contact the owner of a resource there are other mechanisms (abuse-c, > >> > admin-c, contact-c, etc). I would deem the notify-on-ref email address > >> > only relevant for communication between the registry and the email > >> > address being notified. It should not concern others who is notified > >> > when a resource is referenced. > >> > >> So how about notifying an ASN holder in the RIPE region about a policy > >> reference bring changed in the APNIC database? > > > >Today that would not be trivial.. It would not be aligned with current > >behaviour that RIPE mirrors or monitors other registries and their > >objects. > > Let's start someplace. Once the other RIRs see how great and wonderful > notify-on-ref is inside the RIPE region in 2015, they will implement it as > well (2016-2018), and then by 2019, the other RIRs will have to get > together and decide how to mirror and monitor the references between each > other. > > Rome wasn't built in a day. *Reviving old thread* Is there a volunteer who wants to write up a specification/requirements text for discussion on db-wg at ripe.net, and after consensus we can ask RIPE NCC to implement this feature? Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Who uses the RIPE IRR and for what?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Call for Input - RPKI Browser (by Matthias Waehlisch)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]