[routing-wg] FW: FW: discussion about rogue database objects

No, I won't do that! I'm against the methods of resolving "problems"
which are not exist and I will make all my efforts for not allowing the
RPKI to be the only method of doing business.

Not very regards,
Vladislav

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:28 AM
To: Potapov Vladislav
Cc: gert at space.net; routing-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [routing-wg] FW: discussion about rogue database objects

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:25:44PM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:18:25AM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote:
> > I'm not sure the problem is imminent first hand.
> 
> The problem is real, and needs to be fixed.
> ----
> Your word against my word - nothing changed in the world.

Evidence out there demonstrates the problem quite clearly (as can be
seen in this thread).  My word is irrelevant when there is data to back
it.

I'm stopping the discussion with you now - you've made it very clear
that you are not interested in providing a solution and are not
acknowledging that the problem even exists.  So please go out of the way
and let the people that are interested in solving network hijacking do
their work.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ATT00022.dat
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20141113/e764d268/attachment.sig>