[routing-wg] FW: discussion about rogue database objects

-----Original Message-----
From: routing-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:routing-wg-bounces at ripe.net]
On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 1:56 AM
To: routing-wg at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [routing-wg] discussion about rogue database objects


In message <545FDE27.7030702 at velea.eu>, Elvis Daniel Velea
<elvis at velea.eu> wrote:

>*Regarding the future process:**
>*
>I do not think it will be that easy to come up with a process. RPKI may

>not be available for legacy (or independent) resources in all the 
>regions. I think this means the RIRs will first need to speed up the 
>deployment of RPKI for all the resources in their registries...
...

Can anyone speak to this?  What resources in what registries cannot
currently be covered by RPKI?  If the answer is "none", then there is no
problem with requiring that right now, correct?

----------------

There are actually not only technical matters, but sort to say
political, law, ...
As about what resources currently can't be covered by RPKI - they had
already been mentioned: legacy as an example.

Regards,
Vladislav