This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
George Michaelson
ggm at apnic.net
Thu Jun 12 00:34:49 CEST 2014
APNIC runs a fork of the RIPE WHOIS code. We track substantive changes. So if this behaviour is implemented in the code we see, it will appear in APNIC WHOIS/IRR sooner rather than later. I'd say 2015. AfriNIC also tracks RIPE WHOIS code. I'd expect it to arrive there as well. I don't entirely understand how LacNIC and ARIN implement IRR. I suspect traction there would be lower. BTW, I might have been missing deep irony/sarcasm. If I was, sorry for not getting the joke. If you didn't mean this ironically, ignore this Paragraph! -G -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 163 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20140612/f25ff61d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]