This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [address-policy-wg] Re-issue of reclaimed 16bit ASNs and modifications to references in routing policy to these resources
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
joao at bondis.org
Mon Jun 9 16:11:35 CEST 2014
Moving this to the routing wg list only to minimise noise. Also Subject change to reflect the topic. On 09 Jun 2014, at 15:53, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > At 14:49 09/06/2014 +0200, João Damas wrote: >> Dear all, >> at the recent RIPE 68 meeting there was a discussion about issues concerning the re-issue of recovered 16-bit ASNs by the RIPE NCC and possible modifications to the content of routing-related attributes in RIPE Database objects, namely the routing policy attributes of autnum and as-set objects. >> >> The observed consensus during the meeting was that: >> >> - the RIPE NCC should not to remove references to recovered ASNs from import and export lines, and neither from as-set objects; routing policies are the realm of the object owner and are not related to allocation data. > > On a related matter, is it possible currently to setup my aut-num that if anyone adds my autnum to their import/export/as-set objects I would receive a notification about it? Currently the "notify" field only informs me of changes to the specific aut-num, not people who reference my aut-num w/o my permission? > > If this is not feasible with the system today, would it be possible to add this feature? I'll explain the rationale: we have recently discovered that hostile aut-num's that intend to perform a BGP hijack, will add the victims aut-num to their routing policy or to their unsuspecting upstream. This policy is then picked up as legitimate and propogated. By having a "notify-on-policy" email address field, I would be able to quickly see who is planning on hijacking my IP ranges. This sounds like a reasonable thing to do to me. In fact, now that this has been mentioned it does sound like an obvious thing and I wonder what took the hostile aut-num’s so long to subvert the intent of the those fields. Joao -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20140609/4c65f63f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] [address-policy-wg] Re-issue of reclaimed 16bit ASNs and modifications to references in routing policy to these resources
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Notification/authorisation of references to aut-num from other RPSL objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]