This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jac Kloots
Jac.Kloots at surfnet.nl
Wed Feb 5 13:07:07 CET 2014
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Randy Bush wrote: > hi jac, > >> Are more people willing to look into their traffic patterns and do a >> similar analysis? I would be very interested in the results. > > make it easy, give them a tool. I wish I could.. there is no single tool in which this analysis can be done. I can provide a step-by-step guide for what I did if people are willing to do the same analysis. >> I also sent a message to nordunet to fix stuff before publishing this >> article. > > they're on it. it is their test space, which confuses them a bit. > >>> since renater seems not to care enough to clean up their mess, and >>> they have been asked many many times, imiho, the ncc should just >>> delete the over-reaching ROA(s). >> :) > > draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-04.txt We're touching the delicate area of aggregation and de-aggregation here. Hopefully the sponsoring-LIR construction can also aid in certifying resources from more specific routes from a different AS than the AS where the aggregeted route is announced from. Jac -- Jac Kloots Network Services SURFnet bv
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Weekly Routing Table Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]