This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] Network failed [was re: Notification of RIPE Database changes]
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Network failed [was re: Notification of RIPE Database changes]
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Network failed [was re: Notification of RIPE Database changes]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Aug 23 02:41:42 CEST 2013
as usual, i could be wrong, but ... i suspect that the reason euro ops think that 'foreign' objects are needed in the irr part of the ncc database is because foreign resources and foreign aut-num:s are used at euro ixen where there is a strong policy to be registered in the irr. combine this with the "if it is not done by our paternalistic ncc then we don't use it" culture, i.e. do not use radb etc., we're stuck with having the foreign stuff in the irr part of the ncc database. that the trustworthiness of these foreign data is no greater than if it was taken from its home irr, radb or whatever, should not surprise us. it is a global internet. when we 'regionalize' trust, the consequences become strange, though sometimes subtle. but then you know this quite well, being the rir with half a dozen rpki trust anchors. </sarcasm> randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Network failed [was re: Notification of RIPE Database changes]
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Network failed [was re: Notification of RIPE Database changes]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]