This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/

[routing-wg] Fwd: Re: Annoucing supernets in BGP?

Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: Re: Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Markstaller mm at elabnet.de
Tue Sep 11 21:10:01 CEST 2012

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11.09.2012 20:21, Carlos M. martinez wrote:
> As with many new technologies, if we wait for everybody to 'do it',
> then no one ends up 'doing it'.

Ok, I agree, will do ASAP!
But will it help ? I'm not sure if I get larger companies on this
track, really..
One example: I'm doing PGP-signing for 14yrs now, nothing changed, the
"best" result is proprietary "DE-MAIL"..

Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlBPjIgACgkQaWRHV2kMuAKuQACfcr4DpYA2wbF1RnLBdBkZDibk
9D4AoKmO23S4PREp0O2Tr3ssCwpuJU1B
=2R4i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Fwd: Re: Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ routing-wg Archives ]