This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Markstaller
mm at elabnet.de
Tue Sep 11 19:21:42 CEST 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11.09.2012 17:23, Carlos M. martinez wrote: > Are your trobules traceable to the covering announcement? No, it's just a thought and I asked because RIPE warns me about - and I think it's fully wrong for any ISP to be able to announce something he doesnt own !? > More specifics should always win, period. Regardless even of BGP > attributes, so I'm curious if your issues are traceable to the /5. Theoretically: right. Practically: we lost yesterday somehow against Swisscom.. P.S.: My question is not(!) how to resolve this specific issue but rather how to prevent such extremely big misuse.. I attendended the RIPE-Trainings on RIR etc., keep my records up2date but noone else @T1/2 does (?) Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBPcyYACgkQaWRHV2kMuAKIhwCg1Y+JfqKsUaTedogKwGFbqHRU NxAAoNuJJE1hatICUgFeQy/OPhfoP+JH =RUIG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Annoucing supernets in BGP?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]