This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arturo Servin
aservin at lacnic.net
Thu May 17 20:31:42 CEST 2012
On 17 May 2012, at 00:47, Randy Bush wrote: >> Could someone make: >> 2) put the graphs at 'not rpki.net' on rpki.net (too) > > no. that is the exact point. the graph to which i pointed is on rob's > site. these are data each relying party can collect and see for > themselves and their point of view in the universe, Which I think it is a very valuable thing as a RP operator. I haven't used the lastest versions of RIPE NCC validator for myself but that would be a nice feature to have there as well. I will update my rcynic installation, I liked the graphs. > not some central > authority. > ripe/ncc thinks it is the center of the universe. we do > not. we know it is in freemont [0], a neighborhood of seattle. I do not think that is the intention from RIPE NCC. The intention as I understood is to get the data that each RP is getting and to send it to central repository for further analysis. Which it is a centralized approach but for simplicity, not for thinking that they are the center of the universe. In my view there are 2 problems. One is to see as an RP operator how healthy are the repositories where you retrieve data (which for the url that you sent is done very nicely with rcynic), and two it is that as repository operator and protocol designers you'd like to see how good or bad your repository/protocols are doing to provide data to RPs in different locations of the world (which I think it is the aim of RIPE NCC effort). > > so that url is very intentionally rob's relying party instance. i have > one at > http://rgnet.rpki.net/ > but it has not been running as long as you can see. > > and sorry that our certs did not pay godzilla or gobble for the > privilege of being in their bowsers. refund below [1] > > randy > > [0] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fremont,_Seattle > http://www.stonerforums.com/lounge/members/guiness-albums-stuff-picture19971-center-known-universe-freemont.jpg > http://www.waymarking.com/gallery/image.aspx?f=1&guid=e712e7f5-0a55-4cc0-a40c-88deedce8d72&gid=3 If anybody else is willing to share its data and URLs about their RP performance, I would be nice. I have an old rsync installation that I will try to update this weekend. Now it is here but does not show too much: http://www.labs.lacnic.net/~rpki/rpki-monitor/rpki-ta-status.xml Regards, as -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/routing-wg/attachments/20120517/0addc62e/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] RPKI performance metrics; your help requested
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]