This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arturo Servin
aservin at lacnic.net
Mon Feb 7 14:02:25 CET 2011
Question. When you refer to the last /8: Do you refer to the last /8 given to RIPE NCC by IANA? or The last /8 stock of addresses in RIPE (generated may be by fragments from several other /8s)? Thanks, .as On 7 Feb 2011, at 10:43, Nurani Nimpuno wrote: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509.html#----use-of-last----for-pa-allocations > > 5.6 Use of last /8 for PA Allocations > <snip> > • Allocations for LIRs from the last /8 > > On application for IPv4 resources LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses according to the following: > > a. LIRs may only receive one allocation from this /8. The size of the allocation made under this policy will be exactly one /22. > > b. LIRs receive only one /22, even if their needs justify a larger allocation. > <snip> > > So neither minimum or maximum I guess. But exactly a /22. > > Nurani > > On 7 feb 2011, at 12.38, Max Tulyev wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> so _minimum_ or _maximum_? >> >> 07.02.11 11:31, Andrea Cima написав(ла): >>> The minimum allocation size for this /8 has been set at /22. >> >> -- >> WBR, >> Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO) >>
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] New IPv4 block allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]