This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] survey on RFD
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Band
alexb at ripe.net
Tue Apr 19 17:03:52 CEST 2011
[apologies for duplicates] Dear colleagues, We just published an article on RIPE Labs on the usage of the 'Maximum Length' option in ROAs. We compared all the prefixes in the Repository which are covered by a ROA to the prefixes seen by RIS. It gives a good indication how people are using this option, and what the effects are when people base routing decisions on validation results. You can read the article here: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/AlexBand/using-the-maximum-length-option-in-roas Kind regards, Alex Band Product Manager
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] survey on RFD
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] Analysis of the ‘Maximum Length’ Option in Certification ROAs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]