This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon May 3 09:39:36 CEST 2010
> I think, in order to come up with a normal figure, we need to
> normalise the data as best we can. Taking the average number of
> deaggregates per v4 allocation size should give us an idea of how much
> people may want to deaggregate their v6 allocation (which in this
> region is likely to be /32),
>
> Am in full acceptance of the fact that some people deaggregate for
> either other TE reasons (e.g high localpref and lack of community
> support by expensive upstream) or no good reason at all (i.e ignorance
> / assumptions about the way the internet works)
you may find an upcoming JSAC paper somewhat interesting
http://archive.psg.com/jsac-deag.pdf
randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]