This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 28 00:03:59 CEST 2010
> I suppose the question Rob and I are trying to address is, do we want to > encourage ISPs to take their /32 and announce all 65536 /48s in an > effort to do some kind of amazing traffic engineering act by juggling > all 65k prefixes at once? no > Or do we want to encourage ISPs to think aggregation, and only leak the > subprefixes that they need to leak to support their multihoming > customers and traffic engineering requirements? yes > Anyway, the doc would just be recommendations and how many years did it take to clean up the ripe docco on route flap dampening recommendations? randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]