This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Apr 27 19:22:20 CEST 2010
On 27/04/2010 17:13, Sander Steffann wrote: > What would you suggest as a conservative approach? I4 bits of > de-aggregation (/36)? 42? Pulling a figure out of the hat is the Wrong Approach. If we make a decision about this, the decision is going to affect routing de-aggregation for the lifetime of ipv6. If we're going to choose a figure, at least let's do it on the basis of some form of modelling which we can mull over and come to some form of consensus on. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]