This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Apr 27 13:27:22 CEST 2010
On 27/04/2010 11:29, David Freedman wrote: > Could we not use current ipv4 deaggregation + growth to make some > estimations about what could happen with ipv6? we could - we just haven't. And I'm concerned at what the ipv4 deaggregation frequency looks like: http://twinkie.foobar.org/~nick/ipv4-freq-linear-axis.png http://twinkie.foobar.org/~nick/ipv4-freq-log-axis.png Same data in both cases - just different axis scaling. /24 was noted retrospectively in ripe-399 - it had been a de-facto standard for a very long time. We don't have this convention in ipv6. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]