[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing Recommendations

Nick Hilliard said the following on 27/04/10 07:57 :
> On 26/04/2010 13:32, Randy Bush wrote:
>> we tell people ipv6 allows multi-homing.
> 
> Do we?   Which particular vapour are you referring to here?

I suppose the question Rob and I are trying to address is, do we want to
encourage ISPs to take their /32 and announce all 65536 /48s in an
effort to do some kind of amazing traffic engineering act by juggling
all 65k prefixes at once?

Or do we want to encourage ISPs to think aggregation, and only leak the
subprefixes that they need to leak to support their multihoming
customers and traffic engineering requirements?

Anyway, the doc would just be recommendations, along the lines of
RIPE-399 being no more than recommendations. If folks think we are
wasting our time putting together an IPv6 equivalent, let us know, and
we can stop here. ;-)

philip
--