This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Mon Apr 19 17:05:06 CEST 2010
I'll be interested in hearing what the rest of the working group has to say on this. When the document was last presented to the group, at the meeting in Lisbon, it was felt that /36 was an appropriate level to limit the worst cases of deaggregation. Is there still a demand for this document to progress? > Every organization is autonomous in terms of its IT infrastructure and > in terms of its connection to the Internet. Is PI a more appropriate fit for this? Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg] IPv6 Routing request
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]