This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]Re: Comments on IPv6 Routing Recommendations
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]The Cidr Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Dec 17 14:04:02 CET 2009
* Jerome Durand: > As the idea was to dissociate routing & addressing, I'm wondering if > RIPE NCC would help me get a new /32 if I'm using all my /36's (even > if there are very few /48's allocated from every /36 )? I suppose we should make clear that strict filtering at RIR allocation size is not a good idea. IPv6 is not much different from IPv4 in this regard. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]The Cidr Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]