This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]RE: a (perhaps) naive question...
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]a (perhaps) naive question...
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]a (perhaps) naive question...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Francis
francis at cs.cornell.edu
Wed Sep 24 22:01:31 CEST 2008
Actually, never mind, I got the answer (and feel a bit stupid for not knowing it in the first place). PF > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Francis > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 3:16 PM > To: Routing WG > Subject: a (perhaps) naive question... > > > > I was wondering the other day why we don't do aggregating in > BGP along the lines of registry assignments. For instance, > what stops the set of ISPs within Europe from from taking the > 15 or 20 prefixes given to RIPE by IANA, and collectively > aggregating those prefixes when advertising to non-RIPE ISPs? > It seems to me that they could advertise all of their AS#'s > as a huge AS-set for these prefixes. > > Is there a technical issue that prevents this, or does the > organizational effort needed simply outweigh the benefit that > would accrue? > > PF >
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]a (perhaps) naive question...
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]a (perhaps) naive question...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]