This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Danny McPherson
danny at tcb.net
Tue Oct 21 03:55:49 CEST 2008
On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > > It seems rather cumbersome to file a change proposal for each and > every individual document where it basically comes down to a > cosmetic > change following international standards and will prevent us from a > lot of discussion and the small risk some of these changes won't > get > consensus and we end up with 2 different models. > > Apart from this, it seems prudent to wait until > draft-ietf-idr-as-representation-01.txt will become an official > standard. Then it can be properly quoted. > > Since it is not defining a protocol, it is more likely to become a > BCP anyway. FWIW, it's being considered currently as Standards Track, not BCP or Informational, although either of those would likely work for this purpose as well. -danny
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Re: [routing-wg]2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]