This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon Oct 20 15:16:24 CEST 2008
Hi Rob, Gert Doering wrote: [...] > I've asked the routing- and DB-WG chairs to send a "heads up" to their > respective working groups, so that interested parties can participate in > the discussion (if needed), and because it will also need an implementation > change in the RIPE DB software. I presume this will end up as a task for the RIPE NCC for our region. But... Just as a reminder or marker - who or which group is expected to update the (relevant) tools these days? And, do we have an common understanding of the term "relevant" in this context? :-) > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Representation of four byte AS numbers.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]