This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]2008-04 New Policy Proposal (Using the Resource Public Key Infrastructure to Construct Validated IRR Data)
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]2008-04 New Policy Proposal (Using the Resource Public Key Infrastructure to Construct Validated IRR Data)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]2008-04 New Policy Proposal (Using the Resource Public Key Infrastructure to Construct Validated IRR Data)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Apr 30 03:08:17 CEST 2008
> It may also be useful to consider this in the light of alternative > approaches where the RPSL object is signed by the resource holder, > using a signing certificate that is validatable in the context of a > resource PKI. who signs as-set:? how does maintainer map to anything in rpki? ... as i said, bad impedance mismatch. > What classes of IRR objects could be generated using the approach of > generating IRR objects from RPKI data? route: randy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]2008-04 New Policy Proposal (Using the Resource Public Key Infrastructure to Construct Validated IRR Data)
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]2008-04 New Policy Proposal (Using the Resource Public Key Infrastructure to Construct Validated IRR Data)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]