[routing-wg]routing table growth

Hello group,

I want to raise up again the question about world BGP routing table. I 
don't know what is the result after last discussion (Oct.2005), but maybe 
peer pressure is not the only way to follow regarding the solution. What a 
big transit provider can do about customers of it's customer, which 
politics is "i pay, so i want to do what i want with my AS/prefixes"? I 
know network administrator, who says "I advertise all my networks as /24's 
(few /19's...), just because i don't want somebody else to be able to 
advertise them as more specifics and blackhole me - this is our security 
policy". There are others, whit PA space, not multihomed, but with own AS 
number, advertising specific networks just because "it's cool to use my AS 
number". Or even worse - the combination of the two mentioned above. 
Also, there are administrators who don't know about aggregating - "I got 
my 8 class C networks from my LIR, and i advertise them one by one".

We have tools like CIDR-repors. Think about this scenario: volunteers 
spending few hours per week and catching such networks, contacting via 
email the network administrators, and ask them to aggregate. I have 
success with this, but only for administrators that i know personally.
But i feel inconvenience to contact other people and to say them "Why you 
don't aggregate your networks? Help for stopping routing table growth!"
It sounds sluggish, but it's more than nothing.