This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Fri Dec 1 14:03:31 CET 2006
Hi, Kurt Kayser schrieb: > Hi, > > Since all public IXPs are using unique IP-Allocations for the exchange > fabric, > I thought about the possibility to hook them all up under the same > AS-number. > > Each prefix/IXP is visible the same as before and exchange networks > could be easily > identified by the AS-number and specially treated (filtered/preferred). > > Feedback? i don't see any point in that suggestion... Not all IXes will do that anyways (how to force them?), saving AS numbers is not an issue (anymore), so it's a PITA at best when it comes to debugging some issues with a certain IX. Any why would anyone treat/filter/prefer ALL Exchanges around the world the same way? ...but probably i just miss the point, the suggestion is not elaborate enough :-) -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Idea about AS-usage on IXPs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]