This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Rob Evans
rhe at nosc.ja.net
Fri Apr 28 17:33:57 CEST 2006
Philip, > While we will discuss this document at the WG meeting on Thursday, we'd > welcome and appreciate feedback from the mailing list. I think this is a good document. Other presentations this week have shown a small number of prefixes contribute the majority of updates to the BGP table. If route flap damping in its current form isn't the answer to this, what is? Is education sufficient? Do we need an "Update Police"? Cheers, Rob
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Draft doc proposing Route Flap Damping Obsolesence
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]