This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Volodymyr Yakovenko
vovik at dumpty.org
Fri Sep 2 00:26:54 CEST 2005
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:01:16AM +0500, dendy at ulm.udsu.ru wrote: >Hello. >Unfortunately, I'm not so experienced in the question to anwer that. Therefore >I ask for help and will be thankful for any clarification. > >We have a /20 ASSIGNED PI address block and an AS. Is it allowed by RIPE >policy to intentionally announce more specific prefix than one we >have from our AS to upstream ASes? >For example, announce our X.X.0.0/20 to upstream A and announce both X.X.0.0/20 and >X.X.6.0/23 to B? It is not disallowed. What's more - it is common practice to perform incoming capacity engineering in this way. >-- >Denis Tatarskikh [UdSU/MF] [UdSU/IC] mailto:dendy at udsu.ru > -- Regards, Volodymyr.
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]More specific prefix announce
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]