This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[routing-wg]Routing Aggregation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Routing Aggregation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Routing Aggregation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ryan O'Connell
ryan at hotchilli.com
Wed Oct 12 21:29:43 CEST 2005
On 12/10/2005 19:34, Marco d'Itri wrote: >On Oct 12, Mike Hughes <mike at linx.net> wrote: > > >>A LINX member shall announce no more than (N * 2) + 3 prefixes, where N is >> >> >I could not find a rationale for these numbers. > > The original suggestion was (N * 1.5), with a 12 month grace period (When it was still being debated as a mandatory requirement) allowing (N * 2). The +3 was added later to allow smaller ISPs, particularly those with only one prefix, some space to deaggregate. -- Ryan O'Connell - Network Manager, Hotchilli Internet ryan at hotchilli.com - DDI: +44 (0)8702 555558
- Previous message (by thread): [routing-wg]Routing Aggregation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [routing-wg]Routing Aggregation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]