This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
announce prefix
- Previous message (by thread): announce prefix
- Next message (by thread): announce prefix
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wycliffe Bahati
wbahati at afsat-af.com
Thu Mar 31 07:28:47 CEST 2005
Hi Ofcourse the said network to be advertised is allocated and is registered as allocated to an ISP. However there is no route object for it ie say /20 of the network is assigned and the remaining part is not. Could is it right to announce the whole /16 yet only /20 has been assigned Wycliffe On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:11, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:02:54PM +0300, Wycliffe Bahati wrote: > > Do some providers out there have a problem accepting announcements that > > do not have route objects created. > > Yes. Without a route: object, there is no way to check whether the > announcement is legitimate. > > > I am considering a fact that an ISP > > could have a /16 however it has not assigned this address to anybody, > > however they need to announce this in order to assign this to there > > customers. > > You don't need to have an assignment in the /16 to announce the whole > allocation. But it must be allocated to the ISP in question, of course. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm." --The Simpsons
- Previous message (by thread): announce prefix
- Next message (by thread): announce prefix
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]