This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
.255 and .0 addresses
- Previous message (by thread): .255 and .0 addresses
- Next message (by thread): .255 and .0 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fw at deneb.enyo.de
Mon Sep 13 07:40:08 CEST 2004
* Jon Lawrence: > Without doubt, the pools must be bigger than /24 in order for .0 or > .255 to be used as host addresses. Never tried it personally, but I > can see no reason why .0.255 or .1.0 wouldn't be usable in a .0.0/23 > - obviously assuming that you pass /23 to the hosts as a netmask. Some sites filter .0 and .255, but I don't see why one should support such misconfiguration. ISPs with large dial-up ranges certainly assign .0 and .255 addresses to customers.
- Previous message (by thread): .255 and .0 addresses
- Next message (by thread): .255 and .0 addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]