This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
The Cidr Report
- Previous message (by thread): The Cidr Report
- Next message (by thread): The Cidr Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Nov 13 02:10:21 CET 2004
>>> ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description >>> >>> AS18566 751 6 745 99.2% CVAD Covad Communications >>> AS4134 825 178 647 78.4% CHINANET-BACKBONE >>> No.31,Jin-rong Street >>> AS4323 794 223 571 71.9% TWTC Time Warner Telecom >>> AS6197 814 430 384 47.2% BNS-14 BellSouth Network >>> Solutions, Inc >>> AS22773 401 17 384 95.8% CXA Cox Communications Inc. >>> AS27364 413 45 368 89.1% ARMC Armstrong Cable Services >>> AS701 1230 884 346 28.1% UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. >>> AS22909 412 81 331 80.3% CMCS Comcast Cable >>> Communications, Inc. >> e.g. is AS18566 the origin AS for 751 prefixes that could be >> collapsed to 6? > > not to justify the expense, but perhaps covad is renumbering from one > block to another? Looking at their advertisments I see lots of /23 or /24 > blocks inside their larger covering routes... So either they deaggregated > to renumber more gracefully, or they forgot their prefix-list outbound to > williams and exodus ? > > perhaps covad can explain? or silently cover up the 'mistake' (which is > acceptable as well...) it's not just covad. they're just such an egregious case among many socially and technically irresponsible polluters. randy
- Previous message (by thread): The Cidr Report
- Next message (by thread): The Cidr Report
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]