This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/routing-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michel Py
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Fri Feb 27 05:28:04 CET 2004
> Rob Thomas wrote: > The reality is that the miscreants are seeing a lower > return on the investment when spoofing from bogon prefixes. Because they are being filtered :-) If more people filtered bogons, the "ROI" would be even lower. Although it is clear that bogon filtering is not a complete cure for spoofing, it does help and it also helps for some spammers. The only negative effect of bogon filtering is not-up-to-date filters, which is why we have written this draft that will expand the applicability domain of bogon route servers and other filtering schemes. Michel.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] [routing-wg] Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising New AddressBlocks
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]