This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ris-users@ripe.net/
Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
- Previous message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
- Next message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ado Maja
adomaja at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 11 18:21:17 CEST 2015
DearMaurizio and Colin, Thank youfor your responses. It was bymistake that I send an example where BGP messages are not coming from the samepeer. All four messages in the example were supposed to have same peer, andannounced IP address while different AS-PATH attribute. In thatcase I would have three implicit withdrawals, right? Colin, Are yousuggesting that if I look at five-days worth of BGP update messages and tryingto count how many implicit withdrawals during that time I have that I need to checkfirst appearance of every announced IP address and check if it is ‘truly’ newannouncement or possibly an implicit withdrawal that happened prior to the timeframe I am looking at? Also, Iwas completely ignoring the state change messages. Are you referring to the messagesbelow? I am not sure what to make out of those. Bestregards, Ado TIME:2001-9-16 00:00:09 TYPE:BGP4MP/BGP4MP_STATE_CHANGE AFI_IP FROM:192.65.185.151 OLD STATE:3 NEW STATE: 2 TIME:2001-9-16 00:00:09 TYPE:BGP4MP/BGP4MP_STATE_CHANGE AFI_IP FROM:192.65.185.151 OLD STATE:2 NEW STATE: 3 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ris-users/attachments/20151011/87d4aafa/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
- Next message (by thread): Implicit Withdrawal - BGP Update Message
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]