riwhois dumps

Rene Wilhelm wrote:
>>Is there any chance for RIS publishing *FULL* riswhois dumps?
>>[ I know about http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/ ]
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean with "FULL riswhois dumps", 

riswhois produces record like the one given below.

route:        219.149.0.0/17
origin:       AS4134
descr:        CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street
lastupd-frst: 2005-12-28 04:10Z  195.69.144.196 at rrc03
lastupd-last: 2006-01-19 15:59Z  168.209.255.2 at rrc00
seen-at:      rrc00,rrc01,rrc03,rrc04,rrc05,rrc10,rrc11,rrc12,rrc13,rrc15
num-rispeers: 58
source:       RISWHOIS

Current dump files provide only the following subset of above fields:
origin (without AS substring), route, num-rispeers

4134    219.149.0.0/17  58

I would like to get "seen-at" field

> but all RIS raw data
> are available through http://www.ripe.net/projects/ris/rawdata.html
> RISwhois uses the latest full dumps from the route collectors to
> create a comprehensive view of the RIS routing information.
> If you need more information than you can obtain from RISwhois dumps,
> you should consider downloadng and processng RIS raw data yourself. 
> That would give you full control, allow you to extract all
> information you'd need.

I have no BGP/zebra knowledge
Could you (or somebody) provide links to description of the "raw data" file 
formats or recommend tools/perl modules for processing them?

Are sources of program/scripts used to turn "raw data" in riswhois publicly 
available?

P.S.
I would like to get better coverage of IP->AS maps.

Unanimous AS reports after purging default routes (*/0) deliver pretty good 
coverage *BUT* it fails e.g for hotmail ("inside" AS of MS) and for ASes 
"inside" china-telecom AS.

whois -h riswhois.ripe.net -- 65.54.249.80
whois -h riswhois.ripe.net -- 219.149.84.10

I wanted to report all prefixes with the same num-rispeers and seen-at as 
the smallest prefix.

-- 
[en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi at priv.onet.pl : anfi at xl.wp.pl
http://anfi.homeunix.net/ Netcraft Site Rank: 517577
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
      -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)