This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Should ris IGNORE default routes?
- Previous message (by thread): NOTIFICATION: Emergency maintenance on www.ris.ripe.net
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at poczta.onet.pl
Sun Aug 14 22:33:42 CEST 2005
IMHO ris databases (or at least riswhois server) should simply ignore default route (0.0.0.0/0). Are there any good reasons to keep riswhois reporting default routes? <quote> % This is RIPE NCC's Routing Information Service % whois gateway to collected BGP Routing Tables % IPv4 or IPv6 address to origin prefix match % % For more information visit http://www.ripe.net/ris/riswhois.html route: 0.0.0.0/0 origin: AS9009 descr: REALROUTE-AS RealROUTE International Network lastupd-frst: 2005-08-13 23:34Z 195.69.144.63 at rrc03 lastupd-last: 2005-08-13 23:34Z 195.69.144.63 at rrc03 seen-at: rrc03 num-rispeers: 1 source: RISWHOIS </quote> -- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip anfi at priv.onet.pl anfi at xl.wp.pl All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
- Previous message (by thread): NOTIFICATION: Emergency maintenance on www.ris.ripe.net
- Next message (by thread): Should ris IGNORE default routes?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]