This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
riswhois: reporting total number of ris-peers
- Previous message (by thread): riswhois: reporting total number of ris-peers
- Next message (by thread): riswhois: reporting total number of ris-peers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at poczta.onet.pl
Mon Aug 1 12:42:11 CEST 2005
Rene Wilhelm wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote: > >>Would it be possible to add current total number of rispeers somewhere in >>the leading comments? >>[whois -h riswhois.ripe.net 193.17.41.2] > > It's an interesting suggestion, but the number is not easily extracted > from the internal data structures build by riswhois server today. We have > to think how the riswhois server could get statistics on all rispeers > (total # of peers, number of fullfeed peers, IPv6 peers) automatically > from the collected data. Once this is clear we'll know how much coding > will be involved and how long it will take to implement. What do you think about providing "max ris-peers per IPv4|IPv6 route" hint in riswhois replies? [I think it will be easier to compute] It should be almost as good as maximum number of ris-peers, for some users it may be even better fitted. -- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip anfi at priv.onet.pl anfi at xl.wp.pl All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
- Previous message (by thread): riswhois: reporting total number of ris-peers
- Next message (by thread): riswhois: reporting total number of ris-peers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]