This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz riswhoisdump.IPv6.gz
- Previous message (by thread): riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz riswhoisdump.IPv6.gz
- Next message (by thread): riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz riswhoisdump.IPv6.gz
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrzej Adam Filip
anfi at priv.onet.pl
Mon Sep 20 13:44:23 CEST 2004
Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE NCC) wrote: >>Rene Wilhelm wrote: >> >>>>Are riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz and riswhoisdump.IPv6.gz available somewhere ? >>> >>>yes, you can find them under http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/ >> >>Thanks for the info. >> >>What is ripe stance about using the data from dumps (IP to AS mapping) for >>spam fighting ? e.g. extra spamassassin penalty (or plain blocking) of >>messages from "bad ASes". > > The RIPE NCC does not have an opinion on that. We collect the data and > make it available as is. How you use the data, is up to you. Note that we > do not give any guarantees about the correctness or suitability of the > data. I have tried to avoid risking "you have misused our IP, stop it!" accusations. [ with/or without legal background :) ] > The non-formal answer: I'd be interested in seeing any results from using > this data to set up filters, though this probably belongs on the > anti-spam-WG list. I would like to see myself "per AS penalties" generated by the genetic algorithm used to fine tune spamassassin rules. > I hope this answers your question, I think it does. P.S. Below please find some statistic of per AS open relays numbers based on njabl.org data (njabl.org retests open relays after 90 days) and riswhois.ripe.net queries. It shows that 25% of open relays detected by njabl.org is hosted by 16 ASes. [ 10%->3; 20%->10; 30%->25; 40%->48; 50%->89; 60%->168] No ORs %ORs TOTAL AS 1 886 5.33% 5.33% AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE (CN) 2 403 2.43% 7.76% AS7132 CHINANET-BACKBONE (CN) 3 396 2.38% 10.14% AS7491 Pacific Internet Philippines ASN (PH) 4 344 2.07% 12.21% AS3462 HiNet (TW) 5 314 1.89% 14.10% AS4766 KT-NET (KR) 6 296 1.78% 15.88% AS4713 7 268 1.61% 17.49% AS4837 8 174 1.05% 18.54% AS4812 9 159 0.96% 19.50% AS3352 10 147 0.88% 20.38% AS7678 11 144 0.87% 21.25% AS209 12 143 0.86% 22.11% AS4732 13 141 0.85% 22.96% AS701 14 136 0.82% 23.78% AS6503 15 128 0.77% 24.55% AS2828 16 119 0.72% 25.26% AS3215 17 114 0.69% 25.95% AS3269 18 114 0.69% 26.64% AS3786 19 113 0.68% 27.32% AS2856 20 108 0.65% 27.97% AS8151 IMHO it shows that AS based policies have a chance to deliver useful results. -- Andrzej [en:Andrew] Adam Filip anfi at priv.onet.pl anfi at xl.wp.pl Home Page http://anfi.homeunix.net/ [ PageRank 6 ]
- Previous message (by thread): riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz riswhoisdump.IPv6.gz
- Next message (by thread): riswhoisdump.IPv4.gz riswhoisdump.IPv6.gz
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]