[ris-int] Fwd: Re: Announce: BGP-Inspect sites for non-routeviews data...
Henk Uijterwaal henk at ripe.net
Thu Jan 5 15:37:19 CET 2006
Arife, Can you have a look at (2) below? (bgpinspect missing data). Start by checking if there is data in the DB. If there is, then he has a problem ;-) Henk >X-Original-To: henk at ripe.net >Delivered-To: henk at ripe.net >Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:59:59 -0500 (EST) >From: Manish Karir <mkarir at merit.edu> >To: Henk Uijterwaal <henk at ripe.net> >Subject: Re: Announce: BGP-Inspect sites for non-routeviews data... >X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu >X-RIPE-Spam-Level: >X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: BAYES_00 >X-RIPE-Spam-Status: U 0.241425 / -2.6 >X-RIPE-Signature: bcbd6cf79ed8d289563833a3c0eaefd5 > > >Hi Henk, > >On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Henk Uijterwaal wrote: > >>1) Something must be wrong, as all queries that I've tried return >> >> >> Query Error >> >> Error: db query failed (error: no stat file ) > >This was a due to a couple of related problems. The reason for this error >is that the global summary statistics have not yet been computed. >The reason this had not been done at the time of your query...was because >an update to the original bgpinspect-routeviews took too much time. >(the various databases are on the same machine and there updates >are serialized.) It should work now, as the databases have been updated >with Jan 3 data, and the summary stat have been computed and saved. > >What were were really hoping was that RIPE might be able to host >the bgpinspect-ripe site. This would take the load off of our server, >and updates would be faster and we would not have to fetch the data >all the way here in order to update the database. >Please let me know if you are interested in trying this out. We >have been on the code on and off for a while and by now we have it to the point >where it is much easier to install/use. All you would need to do is >provide a linux box with a large fast disk. We can help with the >install of the software. I mentioned this to Arife sometime ago and she >seemed to be in favor of the idea. > >> >>2) It also looks as if you are only including the data from the >> RRC00 route collector, not from any of the others. > >Right now we only do RRC00 collectors due to the load and disk space >limitations... > >On a related note we notice that we are not getting any data from 6 >of the RRC00 collectors? >- SURFnet - 195.69.144.34 >- EUnet - 213.84.9.180 >- Tiscali- 195.69.144.85 >- SOLA AG - 212.47.190.1 >- RIS - 193.0.1.239 >- CCD - 212.20.151.234 > >Are there known problems with these peering sessions or maybe we are >doing something wrong at our end? > >thanks >manish ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1160438400. Watch this space...
[ Ris-int Archives ]