NCC#2002092793 [ris-int] RIS hijacking 195.80.239.0/24
RIPE NCC Hostmaster hostmaster at ripe.net
Tue Jun 7 10:13:17 CEST 2005
Dear Colleagues, It's quiet in this ticket for quite a while, while on the Net it's not so quiet: the ranges are still (again?) announced and visible (in case you don't know): route: 87.255.248.0/21 origin: AS12654 descr: RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. lastupd-frst: 2005-06-05 14:10Z 212.47.190.1 at rrc00 lastupd-last: 2005-06-05 14:10Z 212.47.190.1 at rrc00 seen-at: rrc00 num-rispeers: 1 source: RISWHOIS We are still curious when is it going to stop. -- Sincerely, Mike Petuschak RIPE NCC > Hi Arife, > > Thanks for the update. > > Today RISwhois only sees 1 (one) peer at rrc00 forwarding the > old debogon announcments from 87/8: > > route: 87.192.0.0/16 > origin: AS12654 > descr: RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. > lastupd-frst: 2005-06-01 10:11Z 212.47.190.1 at rrc00 > lastupd-last: 2005-06-01 10:11Z 212.47.190.1 at rrc00 > seen-at: rrc00 > num-rispeers: 1 > source: RISWHOIS > > route: 87.255.248.0/21 > origin: AS12654 > descr: RIPE-NCC-RIS-AS RIPE NCC RIS Project. > lastupd-frst: 2005-06-01 10:11Z 212.47.190.1 at rrc00 > lastupd-last: 2005-06-01 10:11Z 212.47.190.1 at rrc00 > seen-at: rrc00 > num-rispeers: 1 > source: RISWHOIS > > > The last update is yesterday, 10:11 UTC (14:11 local time) > is that when you reset the session with AS28747? > > -- Rene > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Arife Vural wrote: > > > > > Latest update about this issue: > > > > It looks only AS28747 is announcing prefixes from 87/8 even if we do not > > announce it. I have contacted them to check out which prefixes they get > > from us and also reset the session. > > > > I hope that help. > > > > I had a chat with james, that might be a bug on router software, not to > > propogate the routes properly. But, still it does not explain how that > > route got there. > > > > Arife > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:49:39AM +0200, Henk Uijterwaal wrote: > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > >Prefixes were removed that time, but then (after quite a long time) > > > >re-inserted. > > > > > > Which is strange, right? > > > > > > >P.S. Actually, the agreement was that RS sends a message to james at ripe.net, > > > >and dfk at ripe.net only, however we started CC'ing ris at ripe.net too as no one > > > >was answering the messages. > > > > > > That is actually my problem ;-) I don't really care who is mailing who, > > > but I do care if there is no follow-up on the mails. > > > > > > Henk > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net > > > RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk > > > P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 > > > 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 > > > The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Look here junior, don't you be so happy. > > > And for Heaven's sake, don't you be so sad. (Tom Verlaine) > > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 206 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ris-int/attachments/20050607/f57846b1/attachment.sig>
[ Ris-int Archives ]